#Feminism in India » Unpacking ‘Housewife’ And Its Problematic Implications Comments Feed alternate alternate alternate (BUTTON) * Stories + Culture + Art & Poetry + Books + Cinema + Fashion + Food + Internets + Music + Pop Culture + Travel + Society + Campus + Environment + Family + Global + Law & Policy + News + Politics + Science & Technology + Sports + Work + Health + Body Image + Menstrual Health + Mental Health + Reproductive & Maternal Health + Sex & Sexuality + Sexual Health + Intersectionality + Caste + Conflict + Disability + Feminism 101 + Gender + Indigenous Rights + LGBTQIA+ + Masculinity + Privilege + Race + Religion + Rural + Violence + History + Interviews + Personal Essays + Media Watch + Humour + Positive Stories + Multimedia + FII Inside News * Videos * Podcasts * Campaigns + #SayYesToSelfCare Campaign + The #GBVinMedia Campaign: Media Reportage Of Gender-Based Violence + #IndianWomenInHistory: Remembering The Untold Legacies of Indian Women * Resources + Research Reports + How To Write About Abortion: A Rights-Based Approach + The Crowdsourced List Of Social Justice Collectives Across Indian Campuses + Useful Links * Membership + Become An FII Member + My Account * More + Shop + Job Board + FII Hindi We're back with our flagship podcast 'Intersectional Feminism—Desi Style!' Listen to Season 3 on Apple, Spotify and Google podcasts. [logo.png] * Stories + Culture + Art & Poetry + Books + Cinema + Fashion + Food + Internets + Music + Pop Culture + Travel + Society + Campus + Environment + Family + Global + Law & Policy + News + Politics + Science & Technology + Sports + Work + Health + Body Image + Menstrual Health + Mental Health + Reproductive & Maternal Health + Sex & Sexuality + Sexual Health + Intersectionality + Caste + Conflict + Disability + Feminism 101 + Gender + Indigenous Rights + LGBTQIA+ + Masculinity + Privilege + Race + Religion + Rural + Violence + History + Interviews + Personal Essays + Media Watch + Humour + Positive Stories + Multimedia + FII Inside News * Videos * Podcasts * Campaigns + #SayYesToSelfCare Campaign + The #GBVinMedia Campaign: Media Reportage Of Gender-Based Violence + #IndianWomenInHistory: Remembering The Untold Legacies of Indian Women * Resources + Research Reports + How To Write About Abortion: A Rights-Based Approach + The Crowdsourced List Of Social Justice Collectives Across Indian Campuses + Useful Links * Membership + Become An FII Member + My Account * More + Shop + Job Board + FII Hindi (BUTTON) (BUTTON) IntersectionalityGender Unpacking ‘Housewife’ And Its Problematic Implications Unpacking ‘Housewife’ And Its Problematic Implications Housewife as a word is complicit in the erasure of agency of married women by defining them in terms of their relationships and the domestic obligations that correspond. By Rohitha Naraharisetty Jan 7, 2019 4 min read The word ‘housewife’ is the product of the marriage (pun intended) between capitalism and patriarchy, where breaking the word up yields two of the factors from each ideology which ultimately determine a woman’s social location. ‘House’ indicates the site of labour – the private sphere, and with ‘wife’ being an ascribed status in relation to a man legally bound as a husband through the marriage contract. Put together, the words naturalises the role of a married woman as the one to perform unpaid domestic labour in the home. In other words, being a wife and performing unpaid labour become synonymous with each other. Housewife as a word is complicit in the erasure of agency of married women by defining them in terms of their relationships and the domestic obligations that correspond. Recognition of the word’s implications for nullifying self determination and agency renders it incompatible with a feminist politics which works to dismantle structural conditions of oppression, with language playing a key role in the same. Work ascribed to women is not only valued less but also cheapened with the help of patriarchy which privileges masculinity over femininity. In order to unpack why ‘housewife’ is a problematic word, the idea of ‘work’ must be problematised. One of the key ideas that capitalism tries to sell is the equation of financial capital with agency. What is left unquestioned is the kind of work which is monetarily valued under capitalism and the kind which is not. Most often, work ascribed to women according to traditional gender roles are not only valued less, it is also cheapened with the help of the patriarchy which privileges masculinity over femininity. As a result, the work which women do, or are associated with doing, is valued less and feminine labour such as care-work and domestic chores become relegated to the unpaid or lesser paid end of the work spectrum. Traditionally, masculine jobs are paid for and have hence been defined over time as ‘work’ as per a capitalist definition which incorporates income and profit into its logics. To then use the word housewife for women who don’t “work”, therefore, is to not only leave the idea of work unproblematised, it is also actively playing into a capitalist patriarchal ideology which requires a whole section of people’s work to be undervalued and therefore unpaid in order to sustain the machinery of production and profit. If a wife’s duty, according to gender norms, is to sustain the family, the work which she does in the house in order to do so is her natural role and must therefore not be paid for. The word also serves the essential function of devaluing domestic labour itself; by setting it up as oppositional to ‘actual work’, it implicitly negates the use value of work performed at home in order to make it sound logical to not have this work be paid for. If a wife’s duty, according to gender norms, is to sustain the family, the work which she does in the house in order to do so is her natural role and must therefore not be paid for. The naturalisation of this work also allows for it to be viewed as unskilled work, and further contributes to the devaluation of the same. Ultimately, the word comes with all of these implications in order to justify not paying for or recognising domestic labour as real work. Additionally, the word allows for the privatisation of care and domestic labour due to the fact that reinforcing the easy congruity between housework and being a wife enables the state or governing entity to relegate this to the private sphere and not view it as worthy of public investment. Also read: In Photos: Women At Work – The Many Facets Of Women’s Labour The implications of the word in lieu of all of these hidden meaning, therefore, are many. It reinforces the public/private divide which is often cited by many feminist scholars as a distinction that excludes women from integrating into civil society by confining them to their traditional gender roles within the private sphere. It is also not gender neutral, as unpaid labour in the home as the domain of the work that housewives do is specific to women; with its association with femininity, men escape the devaluation and therefore do not have a commonly used counterpart to the word housewife. The word when used for women ties in capitalist exploitation with patriarchal subordination to create an identity which does not allow for thinking about these women as having agency of their own. When being a ‘housewife’ is associated with “not working,” the importance of domestic labour in sustaining capitalism is swept aside and women are made to feel devalued as subjects themselves. While unpaid domestic work must be challenged for its devaluation, the power dynamics within an employer-employee relationship under capitalism may have the harmful potential to exacerbate women’s subordination in their roles as wives. It must be noted that the function which unpaid labour performs for capitalist patriarchy is reproduction of labour power, or work which allows for someone else to re-enter the workforce to engage in paid labour everyday. When being a ‘housewife’ is associated with ‘not working’, the importance of domestic labour in sustaining capitalism is swept aside and women are made to feel devalued as subjects themselves. There is therefore a need for a new word which recognises these inconsistencies with respect to feminist practice, which would then interrogate the conditions leading to devaluation of work instead of allowing the same to sustain themselves through the word. While ‘homemaker’ is one such alternative that has gained mainstream traction and does away with the ‘wife’ suffix, it still does not address the fact that capitalism relies on the devaluation of this work and of the people who do it in order to perpetuate itself, and once again leaves the oppressive origins of such work unproblematised. Also read: Unpaid Domestic Labour and the Invisibilisation of Women’s Work A new word for unpaid domestic labour can be conceptualised once the question of work itself is deconstructed, which may then address the question of ascribing value to different kinds of work according to gender norms and stereotype. __________________________________________________________________ Featured Image Credit: Shreya Tingal/Feminism In India Tagged Under: double standardsinvisible labourrepresentation Rohitha Naraharisetty Rohitha Naraharisetty is a student of Development Studies at IIT Madras. She is interested in gender studies, aspires to smash the patriarchy, and is terrible at writing clever bios. » Share this Follow FII channels on Youtube and Telegram for latest updates. Comments: 1. Sally Howard says: January 7, 2019 at 7:45 PM nice. I’m writing a book about gender and domestic labour in the global context and fully agree with the feminist power of phrase-making + Rohitha Naraharisetty says: January 15, 2019 at 5:39 PM Hi, thank you for your comment! Phrase-making indeed plays a vital role toward creating and sustaining discourses which can solidify gendered realities. Interested to know more about your book. 2. Yashin says: January 7, 2019 at 9:19 PM Eye opening article! Thank you. I suggest we replace the term “Housewife” with “Equal Life Partner.” + Rohitha Naraharisetty says: January 15, 2019 at 5:50 PM Thanks for the comment! That’s an interesting suggestion; I was thinking more along the lines of a word that would do away with the idea of ‘housewife’ as an identity in itself. 🙂 3. Anjana Radhakrishnan says: January 9, 2019 at 2:33 PM Loved your writing & super well-laid out analysis – thanks for the informative, well-written read 🙂 + Rohitha Naraharisetty says: January 15, 2019 at 5:43 PM Thank you so much, I’m glad you liked it! 4. Mansi says: July 26, 2019 at 7:49 PM Completely agree…I being in and out of job would recommend ‘Home Manager’ as an appropriate title as it is actually managing the entire home affairs and it’s no joke. In fact the outside home working partners must lawfully hand over a salary for that!! Comments are closed. Where honest stories meet honest readers. Invest in non-partisan, intersectional feminist media. Become an FII Member Velu Nachiyar: The Tamil Queen Who Fought Away the British | #IndianWomenInHistory By Hamsadhwani Alagarsamy 4 min read | Oct 17, 2018 Snehalata Reddy: The Fearless Woman Who Fought Against 1975 Emergency | #IndianWomenInHistory By Geetika Sharma 4 min read | Sep 4, 2019 Yoga-tta Be Kidding Me: Capitalism and Gaslighting in Modi’s India By Roohi Narula 5 min read | Jul 26, 2018 Catcalling Is Not Complimenting: Assertion Of Gendered And Spatial Entitlement Through Catcalling By Mrittika Mallick 5 min read | Jul 12, 2022 Periods Are Not Just Pads, Period. By Princi Verma 4 min read | Jun 3, 2020 #MeToo And The Corporate Sectors: We Need Long Term Solutions, Not Quick Fixes By Guest Writer 4 min read | Nov 30, 2018 * * * 1. 2. 3. Follow FII channels for latest updates Subscribe to FII channel Follow FII on Telegram Related Posts Gender And Journalism: Mood Of The Month, January 2023 By FII Team 4 min read | Jan 2, 2023 “The Law That Must Protect Us Ends Up Exploiting Us”: Discrimination And Violence Against Sex Workers In India By Simantini Sarkar 7 min read | Dec 23, 2022 5 Women Journalists Who Fought For Justice In 2022 By Anshula Agarwal 4 min read | Dec 23, 2022 Subscribe to weekly newsletter Email ____________________ First Name ____________________ Last name ____________________ Please wait Subscribe Thank you for signing up! FII-Full-logo-colour Feminism In India is an award-winning digital intersectional feminist media organisation to learn, educate and develop a feminist sensibility among the youth. Email: info@feminisminindia.com Who We Are * About FII * Become An FII Member * Contact * Submission Guidelines Get Involved * Advertise With FII * Intern With FII * Partner With FII * Work With FII Terms * Re-Publish Our Articles * Comments Policy * Terms Of Use * Privacy Policy © FII Media Private Limited | All rights reserved (BUTTON) Search for: ____________________ (BUTTON) Buy Now! (BUTTON) × Skip to content Open toolbar Accessibility Tools * Increase Text * Decrease Text * Grayscale * High Contrast * Negative Contrast * Light Background * Links Underline * Readable Font * Reset